Independence
Day Rage: a victim's tale
On 4 July 2001, Kristen
L. Skogrand was a passenger on Lufthansa Flight DLH
449 from Phoenix to Frankfurt. What should have been a pleasant
Independence Day flight turned into a nightmare in which he became
a victim of air rage. Philip Baum ascertains
Skogrand's view as to just how this incident turned violent resulting
in a flight diversion, litigation and lifelong injury.
What was your own state of mind
that day?
I was in a good mood. My two daughters
live in Oslo, while I spend much of my time in the United States.
Supposedly only hours away from having quality time with them was,
as always, exciting.
Where were you seated?
In 37K, an aisle seat in coach class,
with the assailant, Gheorghe Coroian, occupying the seat in front
of me. The Airbus 340-300 carried only 114 passengers and 14 crew
that evening.
When did you first become aware
of the fact that an incident was brewing?
I had already taken my seat when Coroian
boarded. As a million-mile flier, used to observing my fellow passengers,
I instantly noticed his restless behaviour. He hid a plastic bag
next to his seat; it contained a whisky bottle, and played a significant
role in the violent scenario that followed. Once airborne, Coroian
ordered a beer. The crew served him substantial amounts, while he
doubled up using his own liquor. Although he gradually turned more
abrasive, the flight attendants kept serving him alcoholic beverages.
After dinner, I went to the rear galley and suggested to a female
crewmember that it would be wise to stop serving him alcohol. I
informed her about the liquor he had brought on board, told her
exactly where it was hidden and expressed concern that Coroian's
aggressive behaviour could escalate. The stewardess was polite,
thanked me for the warning, and immediately called the Purser.
How did the Purser respond?
Accompanied by the stewardess, the Purser told Coroian that he
would not be given any more alcohol. He also said that he knew Coroian
had his own liquor bottle and that he had to confiscate it. Coroian
denied having one. The Purser carried out a very superficial search,
missing the spot where I had told them the bottle was hidden. When
Coroian drank from the whisky bottle again 15-20 minutes later,
the lady across the aisle from him saw it. Coroian realised that
she was observing him and he started threatening her, even though
her 7 or 8-year old son was seated next to her. I went back to the
stewardess a second time and told her that without proper intervention
someone would most likely get hurt.
Did any other passengers respond?
I told the passenger across the aisle from me, Richard Lessard,
that since the crew had done nothing, the least we could do was
to attempt to de-escalate the situation in a non-confrontational
manner to protect the female passenger. He agreed. I told him that
I would simply stand next to Coroian's seat, hoping that this would
deter further threats against the woman. I asked Lessard if he would
stand behind me in the aisle as an extra precaution. He accepted.
How did your interaction with Coroian commence?
I stood next to Coroian for about 3 minutes. He paid no attention
to me. Instead, his behaviour made me fear that violence was about
to erupt with the innocent lady still on the receiving end. I therefore
briefly addressed Coroian in a non-combative manner. He stared at
me, but did not respond verbally. After about a minute, he abruptly
undid his seatbelt while still aiming threats at his female co-passenger.
I hurried back to the stewardess again and told her to inform the
Purser that intervention had to occur immediately in order to prevent
injury to passengers. As I returned to my seat, Coroian jumped into
the aisle and told me, "I am going to injure you". I remained calm,
and informed him that I did not want any problems. When the Purser
arrived, I finally got up and told him that Coroian had threatened
the lady. I pleaded for increased protection and re-seating. Two
witnesses also told the Purser at this time that they had overheard
Coroian's promise to injure me.
How well equipped were the crew to respond?
According to Lufthansa representatives, this was allegedly the
Purser's last flight before retirement. As far as I can recall,
he was quite sturdy and well into his fifties. In addition, I believe
there were another 4 or 5 male crewmembers on board. The rest were
female attendants. To the best of my recollection, they all ranged
between their late twenties and early forties. Four male Lufthansa
pilot students also volunteered to help after the initial assault.
The Purser utilised their assistance and put some of them in critical
positions they handled poorly, according to witnesses. As for the
crewmembers' collective capability to handle the situation, witness
statements and the FAA investigations confirm the same impression
I have: they were almost completely incapable of intervening action.
They resembled paralysed spectators rather than proactive responders
to a clearly forewarned and foreseeable crisis. We had repeatedly
alarmed the crewmembers about the likelihood of violent acts, and
specifically told the Purser that Coroian had promised to injure
me. Rather than heeding my plea for protection and re-seating, he
instead asked me to sit down and put my seatbelt on. In my world,
you do listen to and obey the crew! Relieved for a moment, thinking
that the Purser would move Coroian to another area with less people,
I breathed a sigh of relief. However, we then heard the Purser order
Coroian back to his seat as well. The Purser then swiftly left the
scene.
When did Coroian turn violent?
Coroian kept his promise 30 seconds later! He jumped up from his
seat and shouted "Why don't you calm down!" I responded with a simple,
"I am completely calm sir. I am sitting down and even have my seatbelt
on." The last thing I heard as I tried to undo my seatbelt was Coroian
saying, "Taste this..." Within the next couple of seconds, my eyesight
was damaged for life, along with additional injuries. He had punched
me twice in the face in a downward angle with his fist - fortified
with several big gold rings. I attempted to get my seatbelt off,
but didn't succeed in time. Instead, Richard Lessard jumped in and
pushed Coroian away. His resolute action most likely prevented further
injuries during the initial assault.
Do you think Coroian could have been calmed down?
Removing him from the area of tension would have been an obvious
initiative. The crew had the power and plenty of space available,
but failed to do so. Next, the Purser should have confiscated the
whisky bottle as soon as I made the crew aware of where it was hidden.
The bottle was confiscated only after Coroian had already caused
injury and serious trauma. I also believe firmer verbal (and potentially
written) warnings with believable consequences should have been
given. Instead, the crew completely relinquished control to the
assailant, with crewmembers' and passengers' well-being hanging
in the balance. Ultimately, I believe Coroian should have been restrained.
What was the reaction of other passengers as the incident
developed?
We saw quite a typical scenario emerge during the crisis. Threatened
passengers took a proactive stand. The "don't-bother-me" crowd remained
silent observers, many of them not even aware of what was going
on, or unwilling to get involved. Finally, we saw the typical few
that vocally expressed their disliking of the incident, indiscriminately
shouting "shut up" and other commands both to helpers and the assailant.
They probably had no real understanding of the gravity of the situation.
What have other passengers said about the crew's behaviour?
In brief, their behaviour has been described as shockingly passive;
irresponsible; no effective intervention; lack of responsiveness
to pleas from threatened passengers, and, astonishing, neglectful
of my need for extra protection, especially after the serious injuries
I sustained during the first attack. These opinions have been echoed
by many of the world's leading experts in relevant crisis management
fields as well. The airline's insurance company has attempted to
portray what happened on Flight DLH 449 as a mere passenger-to-passenger
quarrel. It was as far from this as any violent encounter could
ever be.
What happened after you had been attacked?
After the initial assault, I once more asked the Purser for re-seating.
I got a seat in the near-empty rear section of Business Class, where
I lay down with ice on my face. The crew reassured me that I would
be safe. The Purser showed me that he had handcuffs available, but
refused to use them. Instead, he promised to place "guards" around
Coroian, thus preventing him from leaving his seat. This strategy
failed completely. Coroian roamed around at his own choosing, again
as confirmed by witnesses.
Twenty minutes later, I suddenly felt
that something was seriously wrong. As I removed the ice from my
face I realised that Coroian was standing over me, ready to charge
again. I somehow jumped up, twisting my ankle in the process. Chased
by Coroian, I managed to limp backwards in the aircraft. Merely
20 feet behind the curtains that separat-ed Business Class from
the coach cabin, I was stunned to see 5 or 6 male Lufthansa representatives
just standing there, anxiously staring towards the section I had
emerged from. They saw Coroian charge into the area I was in, yet
did nothing to stop him.
The crew apologised, told me to go back
to Business Class and tend to my injuries. About ten minutes later
exactly the same thing happened again. Coroian charged at me for
the 3rd time on the same flight. These charges gravely compounded
not only the physical injuries, but also the trauma of the incident.
Anxiety took over on my part. Even following this serious escalation,
Coroian still kept moving around the aircraft.
What injuries did you sustain?
Permanently damaged eyesight, which cannot
be repaired surgically. Dramatically reduced ability to process
balance signals, causing severe vertigo problems. Loss of much of
the strength, function and sensation in my left arm and hand. Closed-head
injury resulting in severe daily headaches. Debilitating neck and
back pain due to ligament injury and spinal problems. An injured
right ankle.
What injuries did other passengers
receive?
Lessard's daughter, 10 years old at the
time, remained within a couple of yards of Coroian until law enforcement
officers removed him from the plane. Coroian repeatedly threatened
her father right in front of her. She got physically ill and almost
vomited onboard. Mr. Lessard and I pleaded with the Purser and crewmembers
to provide alternate seating, at least for the little girl and Ms.
Lessard. The crew refused, and the girl got so traumatized that
she couldn't sleep in a room of her own for months following the
flight.
How was your assailant eventually restrained?
He was neither restrained nor effectively
controlled at all until law enforcement officers took him away after
we landed.
How did the crew react towards
you after the incident until landing?
They were polite and apologetic. The Purser
even kept me abreast of some of Coroian's continuing violations,
amongst others that he had tried to smoke on board after the initial
assault.
Did the aircraft divert?
We diverted to Boston's Logan International
Airport between 1.5 to 2 hours after the initial assault.
What was the effect on you after
the incident?
In addition to the effects of the physical
injuries: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), resulting in depression
and severe anxiety, nightmares, inability to sleep, intrusive recollections,
absentmindedness; and distancing from many important relationships.
Reduced memory retention and cognitive function. Severe anxiety,
with its typical emotional toll and destructive consequences. Significant
financial losses and inability to perform income-generating work
necessary to sustain realistic life essentials, and a wife and two
daughters gravely affected by the life-altering changes their husband
and father involuntarily encountered.
How did the airline respond in
the aftermath of the incident?
After first publicly admitting to the
largest newspaper in Norway (VG) that my version of what took place
on board was correct based on written crewmember reports, the airline
displayed an infrastructure of concealment, and attempts at displaying
their handling as professional, swift, and picture-perfect. This
type of damage control and diversionary efforts stunned witnesses,
and had a re-traumatizing effect on me. Although left alone at the
hospital and then in the dark streets of Boston when released from
the hospital at approximately 3am the night before, the Lufthansa
representative who cared for me the day after the incident was warm
and fantastically caring. This in stark contrast to the treatment
I received once the airline realised that they would be held responsible
for their in-flight neglect. This goes to the core issue of corporate
policy and values, plus the airline's crewmember training.
Nonetheless, honesty simply comes down
to right or wrong, not a matter of policy. The results of the crew's
handling during the flight, and the airline's responses thereafter,
really speak for themselves. Correcting what's wrong ought to be
the number one priority here. Personally, I am not seeking revenge,
only justice. Sadly enough, denial and diversions that even go against
what independent witnesses have emphatically stated seem to be the
avenue of choice on the part of the airline.
What happened to Coroian afterwards?
He posted bail the next day and tried to
flee the U.S. The police picked him up at Logan International Airport,
and he spent another 14 days in jail. Then he made a plea bargain
with the judge, received a 5-month suspended sentence, and 6 months
probation. The Federal Aviation Administration thoroughly investigated
the incident, however, and imposed a USD $35,000 civil penalty on
him. The U.S. Department of Justice decided to follow through with
actual collection of the penalty. Today, Gheorghe Coroian has gone
into hiding in order evade service.
What lessons do you think can be learned from your experience?
A delayed and uneducated response to imminent and even forewarned
threats is a potentially lethal mix. The only valid formula is early
detection backed by rapid and measured intervention. The outcome
of my experience shows that no collective, coordinated set of efforts
and procedures were successfully applied. Once you know that serious
violent threats have occurred onboard, you neither leave the scene
nor leave it up tothe threatened passenger(s) to handle the conflict
alone. If possible, as in my case, you either remove the threatened
individuals, or the perpetrator, from the area of tension.
If you know that the Tax-Free Syndrome is at play, with a passenger
consuming his or her own alcohol during a flight, you don't treat
the challenge casually. Instead, you persist until the opened bottle
has been confiscated, not only because of excessive consumption
and drunkenness, but also because of the potentially dangerous weapon
a bottle is. Once a passenger shows clear signs of intoxication
and belligerent behaviour, and has harassed crewmembers as well
as co-passengers, you instantly stop serving alcohol. This was not
done in time in my case. Finally, if and when a crewmember or passenger
has been injured, you protect that person from the assailant at
all costs. Protection then truly becomes part of basic human rights
and dignity. If you have the manpower, space and necessary tools
available, and a passenger has proven his ability to cause serious
harm to another individual while continuing to threaten others;
you either restrain him, or keep him in his seat by using reliable
"guards". If you don't "dare to use" your existing restraining tools,
it may be time to question both the efficacy of the tools and the
accompanying training.
What type of training do you think can realistically be given to
crewmembers?
Since my incident, I have worked with people who lost their loved
ones on 9/11, passengers that helped restrain Richard Reid ("the
Shoebomber"), other air rage victims and many of the world's top-shelf
aviation safety experts. This combination of sharing, caring and
learning has been critical. Some importantimportant training aspects
that remain in the forefront of the efforts I launched when I established
the Safe Flier Foundation and did research for my book after the
misadventure are:
- We must bring renewed focus on the human factor in our crewmember
training. Technical reinforcements, human empowerment and real-life
training need to go hand in hand. If not, the bad guys are likely
to win again. Crewmembers need passenger profiling capabilities
in order to detect and interpret warning signs early, before incidents
escalate to the point where we compromise both personal and flight
safety. I have interviewed crewmembers from all major airlines
(including Lufthansa), and the feedback about persisting discrepancies
will shock the average airline passenger. We must hold the airlines
responsible for eventual inadequacies, but simultaneously take
positive and collaborative action in order to encourage change.
- We must align implicit liability issues with today's realities
and needs, and make sure crewmembers know them well and receive
backing that prevent them from selecting inaction over action
where action and intervention are urgently called for. This is
conflict and consequence management combined.
- Many fine crewmembers still struggle with a sense of vulnerability
and helplessness because of a lack of verbal diffusion skills,
but also due to a general fear of the eventual consequences of
having to engage in possible passenger restraints or simply dealing
with airborne aggressors. Beyond fine tuning their verbal conflict
management capabilities, they therefore need know-how and conflict
diffusion skills that can be internalised and put toinstantaneous
use on a second's notice, without hesitation and paralysing fear.
- In lieu of the above, it's important to realise that the aisle
can never be turned into a "Kung-Fu arena". We can, however, teach
crewmembers a liability-conscious yet effective compliance, self-protection
and last-resort conflict diffusion system that allows them to
escalate or de-escalate the level of force based on the situation
at hand. This is possible while simultaneously ensuring minimal
risk of injury to the restrainers as well as those being restrained.
- Effective passenger restraint skills require restraint tools
that are safe and effective, and crewmembers that are trained
to apply them correctly.
- Finally, I believe we can benefit a lot from intensifying education
of travellers and flight attendants combined when it comes to
passenger-crewmember interaction and collaboration in the event
of a crisis in the skies. Thousands of crewmembers admit that
they regard passengers as their first life of defence. The same
goes for aviation regulators and politicians, even up to the highest
levels. Since this is the case, and in order to avoid over-combativeness
but encouraging healthy vigilant behaviour among responsible air
travellers, new steps should be taken.
How do you feel when you fly today?
Immediately after the assaults I struggled with anxiety. However,
with two daughters needing me in Scandinavia and my wife in the
USA, I had no choice but to fly. Today, long-haul flights are still
very challenging, but mostly due to severe and chronic pain. I decided
early on to convert my misadventure into foresight that can help
an industry and its customers in a constructive manner. My humble
hope is that I can provide input that allows passengers and crewmembers
to avoid learning from traumatic hindsight.
TOP
| BACK |